May, 2011 - SUPPORT Summary of a systematic review | print this article |

Do interventions for controlling the emigration of health professionals from low- and middle-income countries work?

Health professionals from LMICs constitute a substantial proportion of the healthcare workforce in certain HICs. The migration of health professionals from LMICs to these HICs contributes to a shortage of health professionals in LMICs. The resources used to train health professionals in source LMIC countries therefore, in effect, subsidise HICs that benefit from this migration. 

Key messages

  • Lowering immigration restrictions probably increases the migration of nurses from LMICs to HICs
  • LMICs should monitor changes in HIC immigration legislation, model the impact of proposed migration changes on their own retention of domestic health professionals, and lobby for immigration laws in HICs which consider the health system needs of source countries
  • No evidence was found regarding the effectiveness of interventions designed to decrease the emigration of health professionals, or the effectiveness of such interventions in LMICs in particular
  • Scientifically robust studies should be conducted that document the effectiveness of interventions designed to decrease the emigration of health professionals, and specifically, the effectiveness of such interventions in LMICs

Background

Health professionals from LMICs, most notably from South Asia and sub-Saharan Africa, constitute a substantial fraction of the healthcare workforce in certain HICs, particulary in English- and French-speaking countries such as the United Kingdom (UK), the United States of America (USA) and France. The migration of educated health professionals from LMICs to HICs contributes to a shortage of health professionals in LMICs. It also acts as a subsidy to HICs given that source countries lose the return on the investments they have made in health professional training. LMICs, however, may profit from remittances and, if migration is not permanent, from additional training that health professionals receive while working abroad.


About the systematic review underlying this summary

Review Objectives: To assess the effects of policy interventions to control the emigration of health professionals from LMICs to HICs
/ What the review authors searched for What the review authors found
Interventions Any interventions in source or recipient countries (or both) as well as international agreements that could have an impact on the outcomes.
1 interrupted time series study on the effects of a modification to USA immigration laws (The American “Act of October, 1965” decreased barriers to emigration from countries outside the Americas to the USA)
Participants Health professional nationals of a LMIC whose graduate training was in a LMIC.
Nurses
Settings Not restricted
USA and the Philippines
Outcomes

Proportion (or other measure of change in number) of health professionals that emigrate from a LMIC to an HIC.

Annual number of nurses migrating from the Philippines to the USA
Date of most recent search: May 2010
Limitations: This is a good quality systematic review with only minor limitations

Peñaloza B, Rada G, Pantoja T, Bastías G, Herrera C. Interventions for controlling emigration of health professionals from low and middle-income countries. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2009, Issue 1 . Art. No.: CD007673. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD007673. See in Cochrane Library

Summary of findings

One interrupted time series study was included. This examined the effects of a change to American immigration legislation on the migration of nurses from the Philippines to the USA.

No evidence was found regarding the effectiveness of interventions implemented in low-income countries to decrease emigration. Specifically, no evidence was found regarding:
- Strategies (financial or non-financial) to improve the working conditions and career prospects of health professionals
- Interventions for the education and training of health professionals, adjusted to the training needs and demands of local health systems (e.g. teaching methods, the use of local language training, or community-based curricula)
- The use of compulsory service schemes for health professionals
- Strategies to facilitate and support the return of health professionals working abroad
- Bilateral or multilateral agreements regulating the flow of health professionals from low- to high-income countries

  • Reducing immigration restrictions probably increases the migration of nurses from LMICs to HICs

Interventions controlling the emigration of health professionals

Patient or population: Nurses in the Philippines     
Settings
:  USA and the Philippines
Intervention
: Modification in USA immigration laws
Comparison
: Before modification in USA immigration laws
Outcomes Impact No of Participants
(studies)
Quality of the evidence
(GRADE)

Annual number of Phil-ippine nurses migrating to USA

First data point after intervention:
+807.6 nurses, SE 166.7, 95% CI 480.9-1,134.3
Change in time trend:
+33.4 nurses, SE 7.9, 96% CI 17.9-48.9

(1 study)


p: p-value GRADE: GRADE Working Group grades of evidence (see above and last page)

Relevance of the review for low-income countries

Findings Interpretation*
APPLICABILITY
  • The available evidence is based on an intervention made in an HIC. 
  • Policies in HICs may have an effect on the number of health workers migrating from LMICs.
  • LMICs have little direct influence on HIC policies, including immigration policies. However, LMICs may attempt to influence such policies by means of diplomacy, lobbying, or public relations before they are enacted.
EQUITY
  • No evaluations of emigration policies in low-income countries were found.
  • It is uncertain whether changes in emigration policies would have an impact on equity within LMIC countries. In addition to policies intended to reduce health professional emigration, consideration should be given to specific measures targeted at recruiting and retaining health professionals in underserved areas within LMICs.
  • There is a need for more rigorous studies on the effect of emigration policies on the recruitment and retention of health workers in underserved areas.
ECONOMIC CONSIDERATIONS
  • The review did not assess the economic implications of health professional emigration.
  • LMICs lose their expected return on investments in health professional training.
  • LMICs may gain from revenue remittances sent by health workers back to their country of origin.
  • LMICs may deliberately train health professionals for “export” (for example, nurse training in the Philippines), and recoup the costs through taxes or loan repayments.
MONITORING & EVALUATION
  • The review found that the effectiveness of interventions to reduce emigration of health professionals from LMICs have not been assessed.
  • The effectiveness of interventions to decrease emigration of health professionals from LMICs should be evaluated.
*Judgements made by the authors of this summary, not necessarily those of the review authors, based on the findings of the review and consultation with researchers and policymakers in low and middle-income countries. For additional details about how these judgements were made see: http://supportsummaries.org/support-summaries/how-support-summaries-are-prepared/

Additional information

Related literature

Bach S. International migration of health workers: labor and social issues (Working paper #209). Sectoral Activities Programme, International Labour Office 2003.

Stilwell B, Diallo K, Zurn P, Dal Poz MR, Adams O, Buchan J. Developing evidence-based ethical policies on the migration of health workers: conceptual and practical challenges. Human Resources for Health 2003;1:8.

 Stilwell B, Diallo K, Zurn P, Vujicic M, Adams O, Dal Poz M. Migration of health care workers from developing countries: strategic approaches to its management. Bulletin of the World Health Organization 2004;82:595-600.

 Willis- Shattuck M, Bidwell P, Thomas S, Wyness L, Blaauw D, Ditlopo P. Improving motivation and retention of health professionals in developing countries: a systematic review. BMC Health Service Research 2008;8:247.

 This summary was prepared by

Peter Steinmann, Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Switzerland

Conflict of interest

None declared. For details, see: Conflicts of Interest

Acknowledgements

This summary has been peer reviewed by: Blanca Peñaloza, Chile and Elizeus Rutebemberwa, Uganda

 This summary should be cited as

Steinmann P. Do interventions for controlling emigration of health professionals from low- and middle-income countries work? A SUPPORT Summary of a systematic review. May 2011.



Comments